← The openness index

decision-gaming · Openness profile

OpenAI Five (Dota 2)

OpenAI · snapshot 2026-11-07

Paper and blog describing a five-agent self-play Dota 2 system; no artifacts released

Tier 0 Proprietary service

What the publisher claims:

The one-liner: The famous game-playing agent that was never released.

The six questions

A AccessScore 0 of 3

No code or weights have ever been released for OpenAI Five.

P PermissionScore 0 of 3

Nothing published to license or reuse.

D DeploymentScore 0 of 3

It ran only on OpenAI infrastructure.

T TransparencyScore 1 of 3

The 66-page paper documents method, hyperparameters and training procedure in unusual detail.

R ReproducibilityScore 1 of 3

A skilled group could build a comparable system from the paper, but not the original.

G Governance & ParticipationScore 0 of 3

No artifacts, no repo, no channel — OpenAI published only a paper and blog post.

License

No released code or weights; paper and blog post only — license source ↗

What is actually released

Why it matters

The negative control, a landmark result whose openness stops at the paper, which is where open usually stops.

Sources

Derived from the openness dataset behind But Is It Open? — snapshot 2026-11-07 ↗. Scores are qualitative readings of the cited evidence, not verdicts; tier measures openness, not intelligence.

← The openness indexJoin the newsletter ↗