← The openness index

decision-gaming · Openness profile

Open MuZero and AlphaZero implementations (mctx, alpha-zero-general, pgx)

Google DeepMind for mctx; open-source community for the rest · snapshot 2026-11-07

Open implementations of MuZero and AlphaZero style search and self-play training

Tier 4 Deeply open

What the publisher claims: open-source

The one-liner: DeepMind's game-playing method survives without DeepMind's weights, in permissively licensed code.

The six questions

A AccessScore 3 of 3

All code is downloadable and pip-installable.

P PermissionScore 3 of 3

Apache 2.0 and MIT.

D DeploymentScore 3 of 3

JAX and PyTorch code runs on any accelerator, including laptops.

T TransparencyScore 2 of 3

Algorithms are documented in the Nature and Science papers, but no trained checkpoints or official weights are published.

R ReproducibilityScore 3 of 3

These reimplementations are the practical reproduction path for MuZero-style systems, and independent groups have trained equivalent agents.

G Governance & ParticipationScore 2 of 3

Community reimplementations accept outside PRs, but there is no vendor governance to join.

License

Apache 2.0 for DeepMind mctx and pgx; MIT for alpha-zero-general and comparable projects OSI-approved — license source ↗

What is actually released

Why it matters

When the lab withholds weights, the method can still be reproduced, so openness can come from the field rather than the publisher.

Sources

Derived from the openness dataset behind But Is It Open? — snapshot 2026-11-07 ↗. Scores are qualitative readings of the cited evidence, not verdicts; tier measures openness, not intelligence.

← The openness indexJoin the newsletter ↗