← The openness index

text-llm · Openness profile

DeepSeek (V3.2, V4 Pro, V4 Flash, V4.1 Flash)

DeepSeek · snapshot 2026-11-07

Supporting open source: weights, parameters, and inference tooling released under the permissive MIT license.

Tier 3 Practical open-weight

What the publisher claims: open-source, open weights, open models

The one-liner: Permissive and influential open-weight family with substantial technical documentation and unresolved provenance debates.

The six questions

A AccessScore 3 of 3

Weights for V4 Pro, V4 Flash, and V4.1 Flash are downloadable from Hugging Face and ModelScope, along with the inference code.

P PermissionScore 3 of 3

MIT on the weights and the accompanying code, with no use policy, attribution, or revenue condition attached to the current releases.

D DeploymentScore 3 of 3

Independently deployable, with published inference engines, FP8 builds, and deployment guidance; the 284B Flash checkpoint reaches a single B200-class node.

T TransparencyScore 2 of 3

Technical reports disclose architecture (hybrid compressed and hybrid cross attention, manifold-constrained hyper-connections, Muon at 1.6T scale), pretraining token counts of 32-33T, training stages, and DeepSeek publishes a formal model-mechanism disclosure with a V4 training-data summary; the corpus itself is not published.

R ReproducibilityScore 2 of 3

Moderate for research replication: the recipe, token counts, and architecture are public and the kernels are designed for bitwise-reproducible pipelines, but the training data is not.

G Governance & ParticipationScore 1 of 3

deepseek-recipe and the Hugging Face model repos accept issue reports and the occasional outside pull request, but the model roadmap, training data, and release train are set entirely by DeepSeek.

License

MIT for the model weights and the accompanying code (deepseek-recipe, DeepInfer) OSI-approved — license source ↗

What is actually released

Why it matters

DeepSeek combines strong practical openness, permissive terms, efficient training claims, and controversy over possible distillation - capability, license, provenance, and allegations must stay separate.

Sources

Derived from the openness dataset behind But Is It Open? — snapshot 2026-11-07 ↗. Scores are qualitative readings of the cited evidence, not verdicts; tier measures openness, not intelligence.

← The openness indexJoin the newsletter ↗